Judging by the Scottish case, a specialist Housing Court in England will see a wave of deposit protection cases
The number of tenancy deposit cases now being heard by the Scottish First-tier Tribunal could mean that a similar specialist court in England would have to deal with up to 1,200 deposit protection cases each year, according to the chair of the Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS).
Last month the UK Government launched a consultation on setting up a specialist Housing Court in England to try to speed up the legal process for both landlords and tenants.
Since it launched there has been lively debate, but Martin Partington CBE QC said the very recent experience for tenancy deposit-related rulings through the Scottish First-tier Tribunal has been largely left out of the discussion.
In England, landlords who take deposits from tenants with assured shorthold tenancies (ASTs) must protect the deposit with one of three government-backed protection schemes within 30 days of receipt. Under the current system, landlords who fail to comply with the law can be liable for a penalty of between one and three times the deposit value if the tenant raises the matter with the County Court, but only a handful of cases each year seem to go through this system (although some cases may go unreported).
In Scotland, the deposit must be protected within 30 working days from the start of the lease, and until January of 2018, tenants would need to raise a claim for non-protection in the local Sheriff Court. As in England reported cases on deposit protection were few and far between.
However, since January 2018 all deposit-related cases are now heard by the Scottish First-tier Tribunal along with other housing cases that used to be heard in the Sheriff Court.
The introduction of a specialist and free-to-access tribunal in Scotland has led to a dramatic increase in the number of deposit protection cases with 91 cases having been decided since January 2018.
Mr Partington has been surprised with the high volume of cases in Scotland.
He said: “The sheer volume of cases in the Scottish example demonstrates that there’s an appetite for a specialist Housing Court that includes tenancy deposit matters.
“If we extrapolate the Scottish figure for the size of the English private rental market, the same system could potentially see around 1,200 cases a year coming into the specialist Housing Court that is proposed.
“The First-tier Tribunal system in Scotland has undoubtedly encouraged tenants to ensure that their deposits are protected and provided a straightforward, clear and importantly free method to seek recourse.”
Of the 91 cases heard by the Scottish First-tier Tribunal this year on deposits, 88 involved landlords, and three involved agents.
A total of 19 cases were dismissed during 2018. In some cases, the application was received after the three-month cut off period after a tenancy ends, in others where the applicant did not attend the hearing, and in some cases where the court ruled the case was not upheld.
In 72 cases the FTT awarded a total of £45,974.38 in penalties (including return of deposits and penalties above the deposit value). Most of the cases related to landlords not protecting deposits at all or in some cases late. Many of landlords pleaded ignorance of the law but ultimately – as is also the law in England – landlords who take a deposit are obligated to protect it correctly.
So what are the implications of this for England? Partington added: “With roughly 4.8 million homes in England being rented privately, and the majority of those taking tenancy deposits, it’s essential that tenants and landlords understand their rights and responsibilities.
“The vast majority of landlords abide by the rules, but for tenants renting from those who don’t, there should be access to a court to ensure their deposits are protected and to seek compensation. If we take the Scottish experience and extrapolate it to England this means we might end up seeing up to 1,200 cases a year on deposit protection coming to a specialist Housing Court in England.
“The Scottish cases predominantly to relate to landlords; most of whom said that they were unaware of the legal position in relation to deposits. In our experience almost all agents and professional landlords understand their legal obligations but many smaller, accidental landlords can struggle with compliance.
“The Scottish experience is that a specialist Tribunal with free access does encourage tenants to successfully bring cases and it is likely that the development of a similar system in England would have the same impact.”
The consultation on the case for a Housing Court opened on November 13 and will close on January 22.