Call for urgent review after £100m of rural funding spent on city homes
Rural business organisation Scottish Land & Estates (SLE) is calling on the housing minister to return more than £100 million to Scotland’s rural communities after it was revealed that funding earmarked for rural housing developments was used to build homes in the cities of Aberdeen and Edinburgh.
A recent Freedom of Information Request has found that since 2018, £104.8m of money ringfenced by the Scottish Government to build affordable housing in rural Scotland has been granted to Edinburgh and Aberdeen city councils to build new homes, despite the urban local authorities already having access to funding for city developments.
SLE’s housing policy adviser, Anna Gardiner, added that this situation coming to light should lead to an urgent review of the Scottish Government’s criteria for selecting new housing sites, with the six-fold classification guidance proving ineffective at discerning between urban and rural areas.
Ms Gardiner said: “Scotland’s rural communities are being short-changed by the flawed criteria for urban-rural classifications. Not only do they receive a lower proportion of funding in the first place, but the funding they are receiving is now being spent by city local authorities. This is a wholly unacceptable revelation that must be addressed urgently.
“At SLE, we have often made the case that rural Scotland is treated unfairly, with little understanding of the challenges facing our communities. Regardless of our contention that rural issues are poorly understood by some aspects of government, surely even they would agree that classifying Gilmerton in Edinburgh, or Dyce in Aberdeen as ‘rural’ is a step too far.
“The Scottish Government must take steps to return this funding to the rural communities it belongs to, and robustly interrogate the mechanisms that allowed this rural funding to be funnelled into the cities.
“We know that housing shortages are a key driver of rural depopulation, and any measures to help deliver new affordable homes in areas hit by this issue can make a huge difference. It is concerning that those communities struggling to remain sustainable because of a lack of homes, also have difficulty accessing funding ringfenced for rural housing, whilst it is apparent that those very funds are being capitalised on in what are undoubtedly large urban areas.”
Housing minister Paul Mclennan said: “Good quality housing is essential to attract and retain people in rural communities.
“We remain committed to delivering 110,000 affordable homes by 2032, of which at least 70% will be for social rent and at least 10% in our rural and island communities. Demand-led funds such as the Rural and Islands Housing Fund and the Rural Key Workers Fund are key elements of our approach.
“These funds complement the main Affordable Housing Supply Programme which is delivered through local authorities and registered social landlords.
“Outwith these rural-specific funds, funding for delivery of affordable homes in rural and island areas is not ringfenced, and homes delivered through the affordable housing programme are classified using the six-fold urban-rural classification based on information provided by Affordable Housing Supply Programme grant applicants.”