Developer fails to overturn decision to list Port Dundas sawmill
The developer behind plans to demolish a Victorian industrial building in Glasgow to deliver a block of 60 apartments has lost an appeal against a decision to give it listed status.
In May last year, A10 Architects submitted an application on behalf of Weiss Development Co. Ltd to knock down the former City Sawmills office building at 124 Craighall Road to make way for a five/six-storey block.
A design document included with the proposal stated that “the original brick building is showing evidence of settlement where cracking and sagging is evident”, adding that it was not “feasible or practical” to keep the building because of the level of remedial works required.
However, Glasgow MSP Paul Sweeney MSP applied to Historic Environment Scotland to have the building listed and also got it covered by a preservation notice, whilst it was assessed.
The heritage body agreed and granted C-listed status to the property in February this year. The Architectural Heritage Society for Scotland (AHSS) also objected to the demolition, arguing that while the building is architecturally modest, it is representative of the untold histories of the working class.
Jonathan Weiss from the developer applied for that decision to be overturned, arguing that “there is no historic, design or age significance to be found in 124 Craighall Road to warrant the building to have listing status”.
C-listed status gives the building extra protection but does not rule out a decision in favour of demolition.
Government appeals reporter Lorna McCallum said in her report: “I find that the exterior of the building retains much of its original design and character. While the interior has been altered, overall, it retains features of architectural and historic interest.
“The building contributes to the understanding of the social, economic and cultural history of the nearby Forth and Clyde Canal and the surrounding area.
“I am satisfied that it meets one or more of the criteria of special architectural or historic interest. Consequently, I conclude that the listing should be maintained.”